Which of the Following Is Not a Function of Art

Pattern philosophy of nineteen–20th centuries

Form follows way is a principle of design associated with late 19th and early 20th century architecture and industrial design in full general, which states that the shape of a building or object should primarily relate to its intended function or purpose.

Origins of the phrase [edit]

The architect Louis Sullivan coined the maxim, which resumes Viollet-le-Duc'southward théories : a rationally designed construction may not necessarily be cute but no building tin be beautiful that does non have a rationally designed structure.^[1] The saying is frequently incorrectly attributed to the sculptor Horatio Greenough (1805–1852),^[2] whose thinking mostly predates the after functionalist approach to compages. Greenough's writings were for a long fourth dimension largely forgotten, and were rediscovered only in the 1930s. In 1947, a selection of his essays was published as Course and Role: Remarks on Art past Horatio Greenough.

Sullivan was Greenough's much younger compatriot, and admired rationalist thinkers such as Thoreau, Emerson, Whitman, and Melville, also as Greenough himself. In 1896, Sullivan coined the phrase in an commodity titled The Alpine Office Building Artistically Considered,^[3] though he afterward attributed the core idea to the Roman architect, engineer, and author Marcus Vitruvius Pollio, who showtime asserted in his book De architectura that a construction must exhibit the iii qualities of firmitas, utilitas, venustas— that is, it must exist solid, useful, and beautiful.^{[4] [ improve source needed ]} Sullivan actually wrote "form ever follows part", merely the simpler and less emphatic phrase is more widely remembered. For Sullivan this was distilled wisdom, an aesthetic credo, the single "dominion that shall let of no exception". The full quote is:

Whether it exist the sweeping hawkeye in his flight, or the open apple-blossom, the toiling work-horse, the blithe swan, the branching oak, the winding stream at its base, the globe-trotting clouds, over all the coursing sun, form ever follows function, and this is the constabulary. Where role does not change, form does non change. The granite rocks, the ever-brooding hills, remain for ages; the lightning lives, comes into shape, and dies, in a twinkling.

It is the pervading constabulary of all things organic and inorganic, of all things physical and metaphysical, of all things human and all things superhuman, of all true manifestations of the head, of the heart, of the soul, that the life is recognizable in its expression, that grade e'er follows part. This is the law. ^[5]

Sullivan developed the shape of the tall steel skyscraper in late 19th-century Chicago at a moment in which technology, taste and economic forces converged and made it necessary to break with established styles. If the shape of the building was not going to exist chosen out of the old pattern volume, something had to determine form, and according to Sullivan it was going to be the purpose of the building. Thus, "form follows function", equally opposed to "grade follows precedent". Sullivan's assistant Frank Lloyd Wright adopted and professed the same principle in a slightly dissimilar course—perchance because shaking off the old styles gave them more freedom and breadth.^{[ citation needed ]}

Debate on the functionality of ornamentation [edit]

In 1908, the Austrian architect Adolf Loos wrote an allegorical essay titled "Ornament and Crime" in reaction to the elaborate ornament used by the Vienna Secession architects. Modernists adopted Loos's moralistic argument as well as Sullivan'southward maxim. Loos had worked as a carpenter in the USA. He celebrated efficient plumbing and industrial artifacts similar corn silos and steel water towers every bit examples of functional design.^{[6] [ non-principal source needed ]}

Awarding in different fields [edit]

Architecture [edit]

The phrase "class (always) follows office" became a boxing weep of Modernist architects after the 1930s. The credo was taken to imply that decorative elements, which architects call "ornament", were superfluous in modern buildings. Notwithstanding, Sullivan himself neither thought nor designed along such lines at the height of his career. Indeed, while his buildings could be spare and crisp in their primary masses, he often punctuated their manifestly surfaces with eruptions of lush Art Nouveau and Celtic Revival decorations, normally bandage in iron or terra cotta, and ranging from organic forms like vines and ivy, to more geometric designs, and interlace, inspired by his Irish design heritage. Probably the well-nigh famous example is the writhing light-green ironwork that covers the entrance canopies of the Carson, Pirie, Scott and Company Building on South State Street in Chicago. These ornaments, often executed by the talented younger draftsman in Sullivan'south employ, would eventually become Sullivan's trademark; to students of architecture, they are his instantly recognizable signature.

Production design [edit]

I episode in the history of the inherent disharmonize between functional design and the demands of the marketplace took place in 1935, after the introduction of the streamlined Chrysler Airflow, when the American machine industry temporarily halted attempts to introduce optimal aerodynamic forms into mass manufacture. Some auto-makers thought aerodynamic efficiency would upshot in a single optimal machine-body shape, a "teardrop" shape, which would not exist good for unit of measurement sales.^[7] Full general Motors adopted two unlike positions on streamlining, one meant for its internal engineering community, the other meant for its customers. Like the annual model twelvemonth change, and then-called aerodynamic styling is oft meaningless in terms of technical performance. Subsequently, drag coefficient has get both a marketing tool and a means of improving the sale-power of a motorcar by reducing its fuel consumption, slightly, and increasing its top speed, markedly.

The American industrial designers of the 1930s and '40s similar Raymond Loewy, Norman Bel Geddes and Henry Dreyfuss grappled with the inherent contradictions of "form follows function" equally they redesigned blenders and locomotives and duplicating machines for mass-market consumption. Loewy formulated his "MAYA" (Most Avant-garde Withal Acceptable) principle to limited that production designs are bound by functional constraints of math and materials and logic, but their acceptance is constrained past social expectations. His advice was that for very new technologies, they should be made equally familiar as possible, but for familiar technologies, they should be made surprising.

By honestly applying "form follows role", industrial designers had the potential to put their clients out of business.^{[ citation needed ]} Some simple single-purpose objects like screwdrivers and pencils and teapots might be reducible to a unmarried optimal course, precluding product differentiation. Some objects made too durable would prevent sales of replacements. (cf. planned obsolescence) From the standpoint of functionality, some products are only unnecessary.

Victor Papanek (1923–1998) was i influential twentieth century designer and pattern philosopher who taught and wrote as a proponent of "course follows function."

Software engineering [edit]

It has been argued that the structure and internal quality attributes of a working, non-niggling software antiquity will represent offset and foremost the applied science requirements of its construction, with the influence of procedure being marginal, if any. This does non mean that process is irrelevant, only that processes compatible with an artifact'due south requirements lead to roughly similar results.^[viii]

The principle can also exist applied to enterprise application architectures of modern business, where "part" encompasses the business processes which should be assisted past the enterprise architecture, or "form". If the architecture were to dictate how the business operates, then the business organisation is likely to suffer from inflexibility and the inability to adapt to change. Service-oriented architecture enables an enterprise architect to rearrange the "grade" of the architecture to meet the functional requirements of a business by adopting standards based communication protocols which enable interoperability. This stands in conflict with Conway'south law, which states from a social point of view that "grade follows organization".

Furthermore, domain-driven design postulates that structure (software architecture, pattern design, implementation) should emerge from constraints of the modeled domain (functional requirement).

While "grade" and "function" may be more or less explicit and invariant concepts to the many engineering doctrines, metaprogramming and the functional programming paradigm lend themselves very well to explore, blur and capsize the essence of those two concepts.

The active software development motion espouses techniques such every bit 'examination driven development' in which the engineer begins with a minimum unit of measurement of user oriented functionality, creates an automated test for such and then implements the functionality and iterates, repeating this process. The result and argument for this discipline are that the structure or 'form' emerges from bodily office and in fact because done organically, makes the project more adaptable long term as well of as college quality because of the functional base of operations of automated tests.

Automobile designing [edit]

If the blueprint of an automobile conforms to its office—for instance the Fiat Multipla's shape, which is partly due to the desire to sit six people in ii rows—then its form is said to follow its function.^[9]

Meet as well [edit]

• Truth to materials
• Aesthetics
• Design science (methodology)
• Separation of content and presentation
• The Grammer of Ornament, Owen Jones (architect) - Proffer i
• User-centered pattern

Notes and references [edit]

1. ^ "Viollet le Duc". Northern Architecture. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
2. ^ Horatio Greenough, Class and Role: Remarks on Art, edited by Harold A. Pocket-sized (Berkeley, Univ. of California Press, 1947), although the theory of inherent forms, of which the phrase is a loose summary, informs all of Greenough's writing on art, design, and compages. Greenough was in his architectural writings influenced by the transcendentalist thinking and the Unitarian protestantism of Ralph Waldo Emerson.
3. ^ Sullivan, Louis H. (1896). The tall role edifice artistically considered. Getty Research Plant.
4. ^ Autobiography of an Thought. New York Urban center: Press of the American institute of Architects, Inc. 1924. p. 108.
5. ^ Sullivan, Louis H. (1896). "The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered". Lippincott's Magazine (March 1896): 403–409.
6. ^ Loos, A. (1908). Ornament and Crime (PDF). Vienna.
7. ^ Jeffrey Meikle's "Twentieth Century Limited: Industrial Design in America, 1925 – 1939"
8. ^ Spinellis, Diomidis (May 2008). "A Tale of Iv Kernels". ICSE '08: Proceedings of the 30th International Briefing on Software Engineering. Leipzig, Frg: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 381–390. doi:10.1145/1368088.1368140. Retrieved 2011-10-19 .
9. ^ "MULTIPLA DESIGNER SHOWS THAT FORM FOLLOWS Part". Automotive News . Retrieved 2018-01-08 .

External links [edit]

• "E. H. Gombrich'south adoption of the formula form follows part: A case of mistaken identity?" by Jan Michl
• "How grade functions: On esthetics and Gestalt theory" past Roy Behrens

leemarmuccuself.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_follows_function

Share this post